Characterization of the Grayburg Reservoir, University Lands Dune Field, Crane County, Texas. Digital Download

RI0168D. Characterization of the Grayburg Reservoir, University Lands Dune Field, Crane County, Texas, by D. G. Bebout, F. J. Lucia, C. R. Hocott, G. E. Fogg, and G. W. Vander Stoep. 98 p., 85 figs., 9 tables, 4 pls., 1987. doi.org/10.23867/RI0168D. Downloadable PDF.



To purchase this publication in book format, please order RI0168.

ABSTRACT
San Andres and Grayburg reservoirs have yielded about 42 percent (9.8 billion barrels) of the total cumulative production of oil from the Permian Basin of West Texas. However, recovery efficiencies have been low, and significant quantities of mobile oil remain after primary and conventional secondary recovery. Major San Andres and Grayburg reservoirs, each of which has produced more than 10 million barrels, are estimated to contain 8.7 billion barrels of unrecovered mobile oil. About 900 million barrels of unrecovered mobile oil lies within a northwest-trending group of fields including McElroy, Dune, Waddell, Jordan, and Penwell on the eastern margin of the Central Basin Platform. This oil is trapped within reservoir heterogeneities inherited from original depositional systems and modified by diagenesis during subsequent burial. Current rates of production decline in these old fields can be moderated or reversed through selective recompletion and infill-drilling programs guided by a knowledge of the distribution of remaining mobile oil. This distribution can be defined only through integrated geological and engineering studies of the reservoirs.

Such a study of part of the Dune field has resulted in the delineation of more than 10 million barrels of unrecovered mobile oil in an area of only 1 square mile. Much of this oil occurs in a single reservoir interval (the middle unit) that includes a high-permeability grainstone bar facies. The low recovery of hydrocarbons from this zone is a result of limited reservoir contact during primary production and waterflooding because of pronounced permeability stratification. Detailed characterization of carbonate rock types and diagenetic history, calibration of well-log data to low-temperature core analysis, and mapping of remaining oil-saturated thickness and permeability trends are key aspects of this study. Successful application of these approaches at the Dune field suggests that wider use of integrated methods offers major economic potential in an otherwise mature hydrocarbon province.

Keywords: carbonate facies, dolomite, Grayburg Formation, gypsum, permeability, Permian Basin, Permian System, petroleum reserves, petrophysics, porosity, reservoir characterization, rock fabric, Texas

CONTENTS

Abstract

General Introduction

Historical background

Dune field development

Available materials

Geological Characterization, by D. G. Bebout, F. Jerry Lucia, and G. E. Fogg

Introduction

Regional setting

Local setting-Dune field

Field geology

Facies descriptions and distribution

Facies descriptions

Vertical facies distribution

Lateral facies distribution

Core permeability related to facies

Depositional environments

Diagenesis

General

Textural and geochemical data

Dolomite

Anhydrite and gypsum

Relationship of anhydrite and gypsum to porosity

Siliciclastics

Diagenesis and its control on porosity and pore geometry

Distribution of Remaining Mobile Oil, by F. Jerry Lucia, C. R. Hocott, and G. W. Vander Stoep

Introduction

Original oil in place

Gypsum effects

Correlation of acoustic-log and core porosity

Water saturation.

Calculation of original oil in place

Cumulative

Permeability from wireline

Rock-fabric types .

Relationships of porosity, rock fabric, and permeability

Relationships of rock type and saturation

Permeability calculations

Permeability distribution

Comparison of rock-fabric method with routine method

Distribution of remaining mobile oil

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

References

85 Figures

9 Tables

1. Development status. Mobil University Unit 15/16. Dune field

2. Log permeability statistics by stratigraphic interval

3. Porosity and thickness &erages by zone in Section 15

4. Comparison of water saturation values calculated from corrected and uncorrected resistivity values

5. Net-pay water saturations by zone in Section 15

6. Original oil in place in Section 15

7. Water saturation by pore family

8. Summary of zonal kh data in Section 15

9. Original oil in place, produced oil, and remaining mobile oil by zone in Section 15

4 Plates

1.

a. lntergranular porosity in a dolomitized pellet grainstone

b. lntergranular porosity in a dolornitized pellet packstone

c. lntercrystalline porosity in a coarsely crystalline doiomitized wackestone

d. lntercrystalline porosity in a dolomitized wackestone

2.

a. Intraparticle porosity within a dolomitized fusulinid surrounded by nonporous fine-grained dolomite

b. Vuggy porosity within a dolornitized wackestone

c. d. Dolomitized pellet grainstone from the CZ dolostone

3.

a. b. Twinned gypsum with dolomolds in a dolomite matrix

c. d. Bright anhydrite crystal surrounded by tan fibrous bassanitei?) in a matrix of dolomite

4.

a. b. Leached anhydrite showing pore space between anhydrite laths

c. d. Sample from which gypsum was plucked during thin-section preparation




Citation
Bebout, D. G., Lucia, F. J., Hocott, C. R., Fogg, G. E., and Vander Stoep, G. W., 1987,  Characterization of the Grayburg Reservoir, University Lands Dune Field, Crane County, Texas: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, Report of Investigations No. 168, 98 p.