Geologic map that depicts the surface geology of parts of Jeff Davis, Reeves, Pecos, Terrell, Brewster, and Presidio Counties, Texas. The 9-page booklet indicates geologic formations, abbreviations, and ages.
Principal fault systems in the East Texas Basin were examined in terms of their distribution, geometry, displacement history, and possible origins. All the faults studied are normal and moved syndepositionally over approximately 120 Ma (million years); some have listric shapes and associated rollover anticlines. The faults formed by processes associated with gravitationally induced creep of the Louann Salt, such as gliding over a salt decollement zone, crestal extension and collapse over salt pillows and turtle structures, and salt withdrawal from beneath downthrown blocks.
The Sligo and Hosston Formations of Aptian age occur over thousands of square miles in the subsurface of South Texas. These two formations consist of three major coeval parts, Hosston, lower Sligo, and upper Sligo, all three of which were deposited contemporaneously to produce a time-transgressive wedge of sediment. Superimposed on the overall transgressive sequence are numerous progradational cycles composed of shoaling-upward sequences.
The Smackover and lower part of the Buckner Formations (Oxfordian) comprise a thick regressive sedimentary sequence deposited on a Jurassic carbonate ramp. Four major depositional systems are recognized: (1) basinal, (2) low-energy open shelf, (3) high-energy shoal, and (4) sabkha. Lithofacies boundaries within each system and between systems follow paleobathymetrical contours. High-energy grainstone facies were concentrated landward; muddy low-energy facies were deposited seaward.
Variable intensity of diagenesis is the factor primarily responsible for contrasting regional reservoir quality of Tertiary sandstones from the upper and lower Texas coast. Detailed comparison of Frio sandstone from the Chocolate Bayou/Danbury Dome area, Brazoria County, and Vicksburg sandstones from the McAllen Ranch Field area, Hidalgo County, reveals that extent of diagenetic modification is most strongly influenced by (1) detrital mineralogy and (2) regional geothermal gradients.