Reports of Investigations

Signup for news and announcements




Hydrogeology of Barbers Hill Salt Dome, Texas Coastal Plain. Digital Download

RI0176D

Hydrogeology of Barbers Hill Salt Dome, Texas Coastal Plain, by H. S. Hamlin, D. A. Smith, and M. S. Akhter. 41 p., 29 figs., 9 tables, 3 appendices, 1988. doi.org/10.23867/RI0176D. Digital Version.

For a print version: RI0176.

More details

$2.00

RI0176D. Hydrogeology of Barbers Hill Salt Dome, Texas Coastal Plain, by H. S. Hamlin, D. A. Smith, and M. S. Akhter. 41 p., 29 figs., 9 tables, 3 appendices, 1988. doi.org/10.23867/RI0176D. Downloadable PDF.


To purchase this publication in book format, please order RI0176.


ABSTRACT

Barbers Hill salt dome, located in the Texas Coastal Plain near Houston, has a long history of resource exploitation, including oil and brine production, storage of hydrocarbons in solution-mined caverns within the salt stock, and disposal of brine into the cap rock. Industrial and municipal facilities are concentrated over the dome, and large amounts of ground water are produced within 12 mi (20 km) of the structure. Subsurface data from closely spaced petroleum, brine-disposal, and water wells were used in characterizing near-dome hydrogeology at Barbers Hill. The purpose of this study is to provide a better understanding of ground-water flow and hydrochemistry around a soluble salt dome and to present information that could be helpful in avoiding problems associated with high-density use of surface and subsurface resources under similar hydrogeologic conditions.


Barbers Hill Dome is a shallow (<400 ft [120 m] deep), slightly tilted salt diapir about 10,000 ft (3,050 m) wide at it8 crest. It has well-developed salt overhangs and a thick (>500 ft [150 m]) cap rock composed of anhydrite, gypsum, and calcite. The dome is enclosed in a thick sequence of Cenozoic terrigenous clastic sediments. Fine-grained marine sediments surround the deeper dome flanks, but sand-rich fluvial-deltaic facies dominate shallower strata. Active diapirism has uplifted strata against the dome flanks. Salt flowing into the growing diapir at depth has left peripheral salt-withdrawal basins, which are synclinal features filled with overthickened sedimentary strata. Domal uplift is still active, arching Pliocene to Pleistocene strata and creating the circular hill that overlies the diapir.


Permeability distributions, environmental-water heads, pumping-test results, and numerical modeling suggest that hydrologic communication exists between Barbers Hill cap rock, shallow fresh-water sands, and deeper sands containing saline water and hydrocarbons. Every month several million barrels of brine are injected into Barbers Hill cap rock, which contains highly porous and permeable zones. Saline fluids from salt dissolution and deep formations also occur in the cap rock and around the dome flanks. Thick aquifer sand bodies around the dome flanks thin or pinch out toward the crest. Even so, as much as 1,000 ft (310 m) of permeable sands in the Evangeline aquifer are in contact with cap rock. Comparisons of calculated environmental-water and freshwater heads, which normalize fluid-density variations, delineate steep hydraulic gradients directed upward and outward, away from the cap rock. Pumping tests show that the boundary between the cap rock and enclosing sediments is transmitting fluids. During a long-term injection test, brine levels in observation wells in cap rock rose initially but eventually stabilized, matching theoretical solutions for idealized aquifers that are leaking fluids across broad areas vertically and laterally. Numerical modeling indicates that substantial rates of vertical leakage out of the cap rock are possible and are consistent with the injection-test data.


Active diapirism, salt dissolution, and cap-rock formation at least partly contribute to heterogeneous vertical and lateral variations in ground-water salinity and composition in Chicot and Evangeline aquifer sands around Barbers Hill. Electric-log interpretation and results available from successive (1958 to 1986) water-well chemical analyses delineate a growing area of abnormally high ground-water salinities in the lower Chicot aquifer south and west of the dome. This high salinity is attributed to natural mixing of dome-related fluids with circulating meteoric waters, although recent dramatic increases in dissolved solids (especially chloride) suggest that brine disposal is accelerating salinization. Continued high-volume cap-rock brine disposal increases the risk of further contamination of ground-water resources.


Keywords:
brine disposal, cap rock, Chicot aquifer, Evangeline aquifer, Gulf Coastal Plain, ground water, hydrology, salt dome, Texas, water quality


CONTENTS

Abstract

Introduction

Objectives and methods

Geology

Dome geometry

Cap rock

Stratigraphy

Structure

Hydrology

Hydrogeologic units

Burkeville aquitard

Evangeline aquifer

Chicot aquifer

Cap-rock aquifer

Hydraulic heads and gradients

Sand aquifers

Cap-rock aquifer

Cap-rock disposal-well hydraulics

Numerical modeling

Cap-rock model

Results and discussion

Ground-water chemistry

Resistivity-derived ground-water salinities

Hydrochemical patterns from water-well analyses

Temporal changes in composition and salinity

Conclusions

Acknowledgments

References

 

Appendices

A. Cap-rock disposal wells used in injection tests

B. Data used to graph electric-log resistivity versus total dissolved solids

C. Results of chemical analyses of lower Chicot ground waters from Mont Belvieu public-supply water well

 

Figures

1. Location map of Barbers Hill salt dome

2. Structure·contour map of Barbers Hill Dome

3. Monthly rates of brine disposal into Barbers Hill cap rock

4. Well-location map showing well-log control for structural cross sections

5. Well-location map showing detailed local control for fence diagram

6. Location map of water wells around Barbers Hill Dome

7. Isometric block diagrams of Barbers Hill Dome

8. Cross section of cap-rock facies and porous zones, Barbers Hill Dome

9. Structural cross sections, Barbers·Hill area

10. Net-sand map of the lower Chicot aquifer

11. Map of surficial sediments and depositional facies around Barbers Hill Dome

12. Structure-contour map, top of Frio Formation

13. Fence diagram, Barbers Hill Dome

14. Potentiometric surfaces, lower Chicot and Evangeline aquifers

15. Location map of cap-rock observation and injection wells

16. Hydrograph of the long-term cap-rock injection test

17. Vertical environmental-water·head gradients

18. Pressure-versus-time plots, Barbers Hill cap rock

19. Measured head rises in cap·rock observation wells

20. Finite·element grid used in the numerical model of Barbers Hill cap rock

21. Hydrographs comparing measured, theoretically predicted, and numerically simulated head rises

22. Graph of total dissolved solids versus electric-log resistivity

23. Cross sections from the fence diagram

24. Resistivity map of the lower Chicot aquifer

25. Electric cross section L-L’

26. Map of total dissolved solids in well waters around Barbers Hill

27. Map of chloride concentrations in well waters around Barbers Hill

28. Piper diagram showing ground-water compositions around Barbers Hill

29. Temporal changes in dissolved·ion concentrations in Mont Belvieu public-supply water well

 

 

Tables

1. Stratigraphic column, Barbers Hill area

2. Hydrogeologic units, Barbers Hill area

3. Cap·rock observation-well and fresh-water-well data

4. Hydrologic parameters used in the numerical cap-rock model

5. Comparison of fresh-water head rises

6. Ground-water salinity/electric-log resistivity classification of Chicot and Evangeline sands around Barbers Hill Dome

7. Total dissolved solids and chloride concentrations in water wells, Barbers Hill area

8. Hydrochemical facies in ground water around Barbers Hill Dome

9. Changes in dissolved-ion concentrations in the Mont Belvieu public-supply water well




Citation
Hamlin, H. S., Smith, D. A., and Akhter, M. S., 1988, Hydrogeology of Barbers Hill Salt Dome, Texas Coastal Plain: The University of Texas at Austin, Bureau of Economic Geology, Report of Investigations No. 176, 41 p.

Customers who bought this product also bought: